December 27, 2005

Does editing remove character?

There are those that would say that editing one's [casual] writing results in a loss of character, but is that really true? While it is true that the thoughts we think and the words that show up on paper (or on the screen, as the case may be) can greatly differ, I also think that how one edits one's work also reflects on their character and how they think. Putting "straight thoughts to paper, typos included" would undeniably reflect how a person thinks (in addition to how well they type =P), but at the same time, one must realize that human thought tends to be very disjoint, and that we also don't think in English. Even in writing down what we're thinking the first time through, there have already been "edits" in the translation from abstract thought to written language. Hence, I believe that edits of casual works are beneficial, as firstly, editing can make one's thoughts flow better; secondly, makes it easier for others to read and follow; and thirdly, can allow the author room to best bend the language (English or otherwise) to fit his/her thoughts.

Disclaimer: This wasn't meant as a jab at anyone, though perhaps a not-so-subtle hint to write in full sentences every now and then ;)

As an aside, I haven't written an essay in a long, long time, but it seems the general format of writing one has not yet left me. I also think that I'd be unable to write much more than a single-page essay, if I had to write one again. WTR is going to suck >_<

No comments:

Post a Comment